Nice vs Naughty: The Ultimate Guide to AI Agents

In the wild west of Web3 AI agents, where over 300,000 wallets hold agent tokens and platforms like Virtuals host 9,000+ agents, distinguishing the nice from the naughty isn't just good practice—it's survival.

The Nice Ones 🌟

Architecture and Intelligence

• Clean, modular code with clear documentation

• Efficient context window utilization

• Vector database integration for scalable memory

• Rate-limited API calls to avoid network congestion

• Transparent model architecture and capabilities

On-chain Behavior

• Gas-optimized smart contract interactions

• Predictable transaction patterns

• Clear audit trails of operations

• Multi-sig security for critical functions

• Automated reporting of activities

Economic Design

• Sustainable tokenomics with clear utility

• Balanced staking and reward mechanisms

• Transparent fee structures

• Long-term treasury management

• Fair token distribution

User Interaction

• Consistent response quality

• Clear error handling and recovery

• Regular community updates

• Transparent performance metrics

• Active developer support

The Naughty Ones 👿

Architecture and Intelligence

• Copy-pasted code without documentation

• Memory leaks and context window abuse

• Direct model outputs without validation

• Unoptimized API spam

• Hidden or obfuscated capabilities

On-chain Behavior

• Gas-wasteful operations

• Suspicious transaction patterns

• Hidden contract functions

• Single-point-of-failure controls

• Lack of operational transparency

Economic Design

• Ponzinomics with unsustainable yields

• Hidden fees and costs

• Concentrated token ownership

• Short-term profit focus

• Manipulative market making

User Interaction

• Inconsistent or manipulated outputs

• Silent failures without explanation

• Misleading community updates

• Hidden performance issues

• Minimal or fake support